OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The functions `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` are…
GitHub_M·CWE-354·Published 2022-08-14
OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The functions `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issue for the functions that take a single `bytes` argument, and not the functions that take `r, v, s` or `r, vs` as separate arguments. The potentially affected contracts are those that implement signature reuse or replay protection by marking the signature itself as used rather than the signed message or a nonce included in it. A user may take a signature that has already been submitted, submit it again in a different form, and bypass this protection. The issue has been patched in 4.7.3.
OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The functions `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issue for the functions that take a single `bytes` argument, and not the functions that take `r, v, s` or `r, vs` as separate arguments. The potentially affected contracts are those that implement signature reuse or replay protection by marking the signature itself as used rather than the signed message or a nonce included in it. A user may take a signature that has already been submitted, submit it again in a different form, and bypass this protection. The issue has been patched in 4.7.3.
### Impact The functions `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issue for the functions that take a single `bytes` argument, and not the functions that take `r, v, s` or `r, vs` as separate arguments. The potentially affected contracts are those that implement signature reuse or replay protection by marking the signature itself as used rather than the signed message or a nonce included in it. A user may take a signature that has already been submitted, submit it again in a different form, and bypass this protection. ### Patches The issue has been patched in 4.7.3. ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, or need assistance deploying a fix, email us at [security@openzeppelin.com](mailto:security@openzeppelin.com).
### Impact The functions `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issue for the functions that take a single `bytes` argument, and not the functions that take `r, v, s` or `r, vs` as separate arguments. The potentially affected contracts are those that implement signature reuse or replay protection by marking the signature itself as used rather than the signed message or a nonce included in it. A user may take a signature that has already been submitted, submit it again in a different form, and bypass this protection. ### Patches The issue has been patched in 4.7.3. ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, or need assistance deploying a fix, email us at [security@openzeppelin.com](mailto:security@openzeppelin.com).
OpenZeppelin Contracts es una biblioteca para el desarrollo de contratos inteligentes seguros. Las funciones "ECDSA.recover" y "ECDSA.tryRecover" son vulnerables a un tipo de maleabilidad de la firma debido a que aceptan firmas compactas EIP-2098 además del formato de firma tradicional de 65 bytes. Esto sólo es un problema para las funciones que toman un único argumento "bytes", y no las funciones que toman "r, v, s" o "r, vs" como argumentos separados. Los contratos potencialmente afectados son los que implementan el reúso de la firma o la protección contra repeticiones al marcar la propia firma como usada en lugar del mensaje firmado o un nonce incluido en él. Un usuario puede tomar una firma que ya ha sido enviada, enviarla de nuevo en una forma diferente, y omitir esta protección. El problema ha sido parcheado en versión 4.7.3.
| Version | Type | Source | Base | Exp | Impact | Vector |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 7.9 | — | — | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L |
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 7.9 | — | — | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L |
| 3.1 | Primary | NVD | 6.5 | 2.8 | 3.6 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |
| 3.1 | Secondary | GHSA | 7.9 | — | — | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L |
| 3.1 | Secondary | NVD | 7.9 | 1.3 | 6.0 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L |