Go Ethereum, or "Geth", is the official Golang implementation of the Ethereum protocol. In Geth from version 1.9.4 and before version…
GitHub_M·CWE-682·Published 2020-12-11
Go Ethereum, or "Geth", is the official Golang implementation of the Ethereum protocol. In Geth from version 1.9.4 and before version 1.9.20 a consensus-vulnerability could cause a chain split, where vulnerable versions refuse to accept the canonical chain. The fix was included in the Paragade release version 1.9.20. No individual workaround patches have been made -- all users are recommended to upgrade to a newer version.
Go Ethereum, or "Geth", is the official Golang implementation of the Ethereum protocol. In Geth from version 1.9.4 and before version 1.9.20 a consensus-vulnerability could cause a chain split, where vulnerable versions refuse to accept the canonical chain. The fix was included in the Paragade release version 1.9.20. No individual workaround patches have been made -- all users are recommended to upgrade to a newer version.
Due to an incorrect state calculation, a specific set of transactions could cause a consensus disagreement, causing users of this package to reject a canonical chain.
### Impact A consensus-vulnerability in Geth could cause a chain split, where vulnerable versions refuse to accept the canonical chain. ### Description A flaw was repoted at 2020-08-11 by John Youngseok Yang (Software Platform Lab), where a particular sequence of transactions could cause a consensus failure. - Tx 1: - `sender` invokes `caller`. - `caller` invokes `0xaa`. `0xaa` has 3 wei, does a self-destruct-to-self - `caller` does a `1 wei` -call to `0xaa`, who thereby has 1 wei (the code in `0xaa` still executed, since the tx is still ongoing, but doesn't redo the selfdestruct, it takes a different path if callvalue is non-zero) - Tx 2: - `sender` does a 5-wei call to 0xaa. No exec (since no code). In geth, the result would be that `0xaa` had `6 wei`, whereas OE reported (correctly) `5` wei. Furthermore, in geth, if the second tx was not executed, the `0xaa` would be destructed, resulting in `0 wei`. Thus obviously wrong. It was determined that the root cause was this [commit](https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/commit/223b950944f494a5b4e0957fd9f92c48b09037ad) from [this PR](https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/19953). The semantics of `createObject` was subtly changd, into returning a non-nil object (with `deleted=true`) where it previously did not if the account had been destructed. This return value caused the new object to inherit the old `balance`: ```golang func (s *StateDB) CreateAccount(addr common.Address) { newObj, prev := s.createObject(addr) if prev != nil { newObj.setBalance(prev.data.Balance) } } ``` It was determined that the minimal possible correct fix was ```diff +++ b/core/state/statedb.go @@ -589,7 +589,10 @@ func (s *StateDB) createObject(addr common.Address) (newobj, prev *stateObject) s.journal.append(resetObjectChange{prev: prev, prevdestruct: prevdestruct}) } s.setStateObject(newobj) - return newobj, prev + if prev != nil && !prev.deleted { + return newobj, prev + } + return newobj, nil ``` ### Patches See above. The fix was included in Geth `v1.9.20` "Paragade". ### Credits The bug was found by @johnyangk and reported via bounty@ethereum.org. ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in [go-ethereum](https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum) * Email us at [security@ethereum.org](mailto:security@ethereum.org)
Go Ethereum, o "Geth", es la implementación oficial de Golang del protocolo Ethereum. En Geth desde versión 1.9.4 y versiones anteriores a 1.9.20, una vulnerabilidad de consenso podría causar una división de cadena, donde unas versiones vulnerables se niegan a aceptar la cadena canónica. La corrección se incluyó en versión 1.9.20 de la versión de Paragade. No han sido hechos parches de solución individual; se recomienda a todos los usuarios actualizar a una versión más reciente
| Version | Type | Source | Base | Exp | Impact | Vector |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 | Primary | NVD | 3.5 | 6.8 | 2.9 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N |
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 5.3 | — | — | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 5.3 | — | — | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |
| 3.1 | Primary | NVD | 5.3 | 1.6 | 3.6 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |
| 3.1 | Secondary | GHSA | 5.3 | — | — | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |
| 3.1 | Secondary | NVD | 5.3 | 1.6 | 3.6 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |