CWE-480

before_upstream_connection in AuthPlugin in http/proxy/auth.py in proxy.py before 2.3.1 accepts incorrect Proxy-Authorization header data because of a boolean confusion (and versus or).

Use of Incorrect Operator in GitHub repository polonel/trudesk prior to 1.2.3.

Asterisk is an open source private branch exchange and telephony toolkit. After upgrade to 18.23.0, ALL unauthorized SIP requests are identified as PJSIP Endpoint of local asterisk server. This vulnerability is fixed in 18.23.1, 20.8.1, and 21.3.1.

A regression in the way hashes were calculated caused rules containing the address range syntax (x.x.x.x - y.y.y.y) that only differ in the address range(s) involved to be silently dropped as duplicates. Only the first of such rules is actually loaded into pf. Ranges expressed using the address[/mask-bits] syntax were not affected. Some keywords representing actions taken on a packet-matching rule, such as 'log', 'return tll', or 'dnpipe', may suffer from the same issue. It is unlikely that users have such configurations, as these rules would always be redundant. Affected rules are silently ignored, which can lead to unexpected behaviour including over- and underblocking.

A Use of Incorrect Operator vulnerability in the Routing Engine firewall of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to bypass security restrictions. When a firewall filter which is applied to the lo0 or re:mgmt interface references a prefix list with 'from prefix-list', and that prefix list contains more than 10 entries, the prefix list doesn't match and packets destined to or from the local device are not filtered. This issue affects firewall filters applied to the re:mgmt interfaces as input and output, but only affects firewall filters applied to the lo0 interface as output. This issue is applicable to IPv4 and IPv6 as a prefix list can contain IPv4 and IPv6 prefixes. This issue affects Junos OS Evolved: * 23.2R2-S3-EVO versions before 23.2R2-S4-EVO, * 23.4R2-S3-EVO versions before 23.4R2-S5-EVO, * 24.2R2-EVO versions before 24.2R2-S1-EVO, * 24.4-EVO versions before 24.4R1-S3-EVO, 24.4R2-EVO. This issue doesn't affect Junos OS Evolved versions before 23.2R1-EVO.

### Impact A Python operator precedence bug in pyzipper/zipfile_aes.py caused the AE-2 format to never be automatically selected during encryption, regardless of file size or compression type. As a result, all encrypted entries are written in AE-1 format unless AE-2 is explicitly forced by the caller. AE-1 stores the plaintext CRC32 checksum unencrypted in the ZIP header. During investigation of this issue, it was also found that when writing to an unseekable zip archive, the CRC32 value was always written to the datadescripter section. The AES encryption itself is not broken. An attacker who possesses the archive can read the CRC32 from the header without decrypting anything, then brute-force candidate plaintexts by computing CRC32(candidate) and comparing against the stored value. In practice, this attack is feasible today only against small or low-entropy files, as CRC32 exhaustion across a large plaintext space is computationally prohibitive on current hardware. Files with high-entropy or large content are not practically at risk under current computing constraints. Without this bug, pyzipper would have removed the CRC32 value for any file with content of less than 20 bytes uncompressed. ### Patches Upgrade to pyzipper 0.4.0 that changes the default behaviour of pyzipper to always use the AE-2 format and exclude the CRC32 values, unless instructed to do otherwise. If rewriting the zip archive to remove the CRC values for small files, the entire zip archive should be recreated to avoid the original local file header with the CRC included remaining in the zip file in a detached state. ## Credit Thanks to Lucas Lavarello from Kulkan Security for identifying this issue. ### References https://www.winzip.com/en/support/aes-encryption/#CRC https://www.winzip.com/en/support/aes-encryption/#crc-faq