Fastify is a fast and low overhead web framework, for Node.js. In versions 5.0.0 to 5.3.0 as well as version 4.29.0, applications that…
GitHub_M·CWE-1287·Published 2025-04-18
Fastify is a fast and low overhead web framework, for Node.js. In versions 5.0.0 to 5.3.0 as well as version 4.29.0, applications that specify different validation strategies for different content types have a possibility to bypass validation by providing a _slightly altered_ content type such as with different casing or altered whitespacing before `;`. This was patched in v5.3.1, but the initial patch did not cover all problems. This has been fully patched in v5.3.2 and v4.29.1. A workaround involves not specifying individual content types in the schema.
Fastify is a fast and low overhead web framework, for Node.js. In versions 5.0.0 to 5.3.0 as well as version 4.29.0, applications that specify different validation strategies for different content types have a possibility to bypass validation by providing a _slightly altered_ content type such as with different casing or altered whitespacing before `;`. This was patched in v5.3.1, but the initial patch did not cover all problems. This has been fully patched in v5.3.2 and v4.29.1. A workaround involves not specifying individual content types in the schema.
### Impact In applications that specify different validation strategies for different content types, it's possible to bypass the validation by providing a _slightly altered_ content type such as with different casing or altered whitespacing before `;`. Users using the the following pattern are affected: ```js fastify.post('/', { handler(request, reply) { reply.code(200).send(request.body) }, schema: { body: { content: { 'application/json': { schema: { type: 'object', properties: { 'foo': { type: 'string', } }, required: ['foo'] } }, } } } }) ``` User using the following pattern are **not** affected: ```js fastify.post('/', { handler(request, reply) { reply.code(200).send(request.body) }, schema: { body: { type: 'object', properties: { 'foo': { type: 'string', } }, required: ['foo'] } } }) ``` ### Patches This was patched in v5.3.1, but unfortunately it did not cover all problems. This has been fully patched in v5.3.2. Version v4.9.0 was also affected by this issue. This has been fully patched in v4.9.1. ### Workarounds Do not specify multiple content types in the schema. ### References _Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_ https://hackerone.com/reports/3087928
### Impact In applications that specify different validation strategies for different content types, it's possible to bypass the validation by providing a _slightly altered_ content type such as with different casing or altered whitespacing before `;`. Users using the the following pattern are affected: ```js fastify.post('/', { handler(request, reply) { reply.code(200).send(request.body) }, schema: { body: { content: { 'application/json': { schema: { type: 'object', properties: { 'foo': { type: 'string', } }, required: ['foo'] } }, } } } }) ``` User using the following pattern are **not** affected: ```js fastify.post('/', { handler(request, reply) { reply.code(200).send(request.body) }, schema: { body: { type: 'object', properties: { 'foo': { type: 'string', } }, required: ['foo'] } } }) ``` ### Patches This was patched in v5.3.1, but unfortunately it did not cover all problems. This has been fully patched in v5.3.2. Version v4.9.0 was also affected by this issue. This has been fully patched in v4.9.1. ### Workarounds Do not specify multiple content types in the schema. ### References _Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_ https://hackerone.com/reports/3087928
Fastify es un framework web rápido y de bajo consumo para Node.js. En las versiones 5.0.0 a 5.3.0, las aplicaciones que especifican diferentes estrategias de validación para distintos tipos de contenido pueden omitir la validación proporcionando un tipo de contenido ligeramente modificado, como con mayúsculas y minúsculas diferentes o con espacios antes de `;` modificados. Esto se solucionó en la versión 5.3.1, pero la corrección inicial no solucionó todos los problemas. Se ha corregido completamente en la versión 5.3.2. Un workaround consiste en no especificar tipos de contenido individuales en el esquema.
| Version | Type | Source | Base | Exp | Impact | Vector |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 7.5 | — | — | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 7.5 | — | — | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |
| 3.1 | Secondary | GHSA | 7.5 | — | — | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |
| 3.1 | Secondary | NVD | 7.5 | 3.9 | 3.6 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |